Pahe.in HQ Movies at Affordable Size
Birth (2004)
6.3
File ...........: .mkv
Source .........: 1080p.Blu-ray.Remux.AVC.DTS-HD.MA.5.1-CiNEPHiLES
Video ..........: AVC | 1280x692 1243 Kbps
Audio ..........: 2CH AAC English
Runtime ........: 1h 40mn
Subtitles ......: English & Indonesian Softcoded
Chapter ........: Yes
Subsource Link .: Indonesian, English
Screenshot .....: View
Trailer ........: Watch
Last Updated on February 16, 2026
Is this the Criterion version bro ?
Yea, tho mkvking won this
Pahe, vc já tentou remover o excesso de grain que fica nas paredes e na pele do atores?, não de remover totalmente, mas de diminuir um pouco o excesso. Obrigado pelo filme!
Thank you for “720p x265-10bit” encode 🙂
Replacing webrip-x265-10bit copy in my archive
Cheers Pahe!
Why ? I think Pahe’s x265 encodes are far more superior
Ignore Alumi
mkvking never do their own encodes, all they do is just stealing my encode and rename it
There’s also a site called Moviesmod (I forgot the domain)which steals your encodes and rename them like if it was theirs. I recognised them easily because of the file sizes plus they upload them not long after you did. No credit no nothing.
Can you substantiate your claim by posting video link from that site who allegedly steals encodes from Pahe for verification? If not, your claim is just slander against that site.
I have check out that site and found that most of the video listed have dual or multi audio which, Pahe almost NEVER do unless Pahe have an arrangement (business or otherwise) with that site to do encoding for them.
@BHB – Thank you for your verification.
I have tried to verify by accessing that site and attempt their download steps for “Stephanie (2017)” – only going as far as to their DriveSeed download server, and saw they named their file name as “Stephanie.2017.720p.BluRay.x264.700MB-moviesmod.mkv”.
I did not make a download but your screen shot of its mediainfo with the file name and cover.jpg line proved conclusively that the site have stolen your work.
I apologize unreservedly for my previous posting to both of you, BHB and Leon.
Just curious, although the other site did not change the attachment jpg “copyright” notice, did they change your other embedded notice (I am not going to say what and where it is)?