Pahe.in HQ Movies at Affordable Size
Eyes Wide Shut (1999)
7.5
File ...........: .mkv
Source .........: 1080p.Blu-ray.Remux.AVC.DTS-HD.MA.5.1-CiNEPHiLES
Video ..........: AVC | 1280x694 1320 Kbps
Audio ..........: 2CH AAC English
Runtime ........: 2h 39mn
Subtitles ......: English & Indonesian Softcoded
Chapter ........: Yes
Subsource Link .: Indonesian, English
Screenshot .....: View
Trailer ........: Watch
Last Updated on November 21, 2025
Thank you for the 4k , BHB = For Stanley kubrick
Wow – 20 gb file , From pahe
Thank you Pahe, Have you considered using some grain filtering for smaller versions? I understand the desire to preserve Blu-ray fidelity, but grain with CRF29 is impossible, and HQ is too big. A little grain filtering would be appropriate for smaller versions.
Hm, this looks super grainy, is it supposed to be this way? (1080p x265)
Yes
Thank you for “720p x265-10bit” encode 🙂
Replacing x264 copy in my archive
Cheers Pahe!
Fidelio
Extremely grainy. My yts 720p looked better honestly.
naughty nicole and not too tall tom… what a pair. after eating her mcdonalds, she moved on to eating crickets. what an amazingly tall woman she is!
Real Cinephile loves grain — and hates DNR
THIS IS ABSOLUTE CINEMA
Your 720p clip only looks “clean” because digital filters erase real grain, natural lighting, and texture-removing the depth that cinema relies on. These fake smoothing tricks flatten the image and ruin the original craft, while truly well-shot films look better without any of that artificial gloss.
If you think a filtered 720p YouTube clip looks better than a film shot with intentional grain and real lighting, you’re basically admitting you don’t understand how cinema actually works. Grain, exposure, and texture are the language of film, and preferring plastic smoothing over that is like praising a toy guitar for sounding “cleaner” than a real instrument.
Look at Ben-Hur: decades old, shot on real film, and it still looks way more powerful, rich, and dimensional because it was crafted with genuine photographic skill – no artificial gloss needed. Today’s artificially “polished” digital visuals, by comparison, look flat, synthetic, and cheap. Lke someone ironed the life out of the image.
Is this criterion collection version??
The old blu-ray with shittier transfer still exists if you don’t like the grain in a proper film scan supervised by the cinematographer.